As for videotaping Haley’s statements, they couldn’t be used in lieu of her actual testimony, because that would violate Wanker’s right to cross-examine her. Unless she became "unavailable" at the time of trial, i.e. missing and nobody knows where to find her, not in porn valley, not in her hometown, not on the dark side of the moon. But that’s an extraordinary circumstance, and judges are reluctant to permit their introduction. They do have a value, though, if Haley decided to testify and recanted her story on the stand, a situation not unheard of in DV cases. Then she could be declared a hostile witness and the tapes (and her Grand Jury testimony) could be used to impeach her credibility.
5.7.07
Wanker Wang Out On $1 Million Bail
As for videotaping Haley’s statements, they couldn’t be used in lieu of her actual testimony, because that would violate Wanker’s right to cross-examine her. Unless she became "unavailable" at the time of trial, i.e. missing and nobody knows where to find her, not in porn valley, not in her hometown, not on the dark side of the moon. But that’s an extraordinary circumstance, and judges are reluctant to permit their introduction. They do have a value, though, if Haley decided to testify and recanted her story on the stand, a situation not unheard of in DV cases. Then she could be declared a hostile witness and the tapes (and her Grand Jury testimony) could be used to impeach her credibility.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment